MQCC: What is more important: the name of an Innovation or the results of what an innovation will achieve: A Social Experiment on the World?
Over the past 19 years, MQCC (and it's prior organization name) researched, discovered, commercialized and marketed a system and technology that:a) effects peer to peer (this is a loaded term; visit www.mqcc.org or a full definition of Peer to Peer) finance, without middleman; using a 'system' or 'utility token' as the point of trust.
b) effects continuous conformity (enforced compliance) of a regulated organization to reduce cost and increase efficiency, to both National and International Standard levels.
c) combined the two (a) and (b) technologies, and created systems.
This was marketed to technology leaders and thought leaders throughout the world.
You can read the history of the outcome to the global marketing effort, here. You can also read some history in the prior MQCC blog articles. When you ask yourself, how did MQCC do this? With the "BlockChain" system that it developed in 2005 for a "peer to peer electronic finance system".
The answer to the above question is answered as: name matters. MQCC realized that most people who are faced with a solution to a complex problem, find it difficult to imagine how the solution can be implemented, without understanding the concept at its simplest terms.
Very interesting.
FYI.
